top of page

Outcomes of Scapula vs. Fibula Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction

  • Recon Review
  • May 11
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jul 1

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, May 2025


Key Takeaways:

  • The scapular flap offers a reliable alternative to the fibular flap in mandibular/maxillary reconstruction with comparable outcomes.

    • Scapular flaps required fewer osteotomies and resulted in better donor-site outcomes.

  • The addition of a muscle flap reduced complications.


Objective

To compare surgical outcomes, donor-site morbidity, and quality of life between angular artery-based scapular flaps and fibular flaps for head and neck osseous reconstruction.


Methods

Retrospective analysis (n=120, 2016–2022) at two Swedish university hospitals. Surgical outcomes, osteotomies, soft tissue use, donor-site morbidity (DASH - Hand/Shoulder evaluation, SEFAS - Foot/Ankle evaluation), and patient QoL (FACE-Q) were assessed.


Results

  • 58 scapular flaps

    • 26 used for mandible, 32 used for maxilla

  • 62 fibula flaps

    • 60 used for mandible, 2 used for maxilla

  • Scapular flaps required significantly fewer osteotomies for lateral mandibular defects.

  • LD muscle use in scapular flaps significantly reduced complications like fistulas and nonunion (P=0.039).

  • Donor-site morbidity was lower in the scapula group (P=0.001).

  • No significant difference in QoL scores.


Complication

Scapula (n=58)

Fibula (n=62)

P

Flap failure

1

4

0.36

Soft tissue partial necrosis

4

3

0.71

with exposed bone/plate

4

0

0.05

Fistula

6

4

0.51

Nonunion

1

1

0.5

ORN

4

1

0.19

Donor site complication

1

9

0.01

Medical/Respiratory complication

6

1

0.04

Facial appearance (FACE-Q)

68 +/- 23

60 +/- 21

0.767

Eating/Drinking (FACE-Q)

54 +/- 22

60 +/- 20

0.113


Conclusion

Scapular flaps are effective alternatives to fibular flaps, with comparable function and superior donor-site morbidity. The chimeric nature allows for the easy addition of a muscle flap, which can help mitigate surgical complications


Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths: Multicenter design, matched defect types, validated PROMs.

  • Limitations: Retrospective, shorter follow-up in scapula group.


Future Directions

Further prospective studies evaluating long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes are warranted.


Clinical Relevance

Scapular flaps are a viable primary option for selected mandibular and maxillary reconstructions.

Comments


  • Instagram
  • Twitter
© 2025 - Recon Review - All rights reserved
bottom of page