Outcomes of Scapula vs. Fibula Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction
- Recon Review
- May 11
- 2 min read
Updated: Jul 1
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, May 2025
Key Takeaways:
The scapular flap offers a reliable alternative to the fibular flap in mandibular/maxillary reconstruction with comparable outcomes.
Scapular flaps required fewer osteotomies and resulted in better donor-site outcomes.
The addition of a muscle flap reduced complications.
Objective
To compare surgical outcomes, donor-site morbidity, and quality of life between angular artery-based scapular flaps and fibular flaps for head and neck osseous reconstruction.
Methods
Retrospective analysis (n=120, 2016–2022) at two Swedish university hospitals. Surgical outcomes, osteotomies, soft tissue use, donor-site morbidity (DASH - Hand/Shoulder evaluation, SEFAS - Foot/Ankle evaluation), and patient QoL (FACE-Q) were assessed.
Results
58 scapular flaps
26 used for mandible, 32 used for maxilla
62 fibula flaps
60 used for mandible, 2 used for maxilla
Scapular flaps required significantly fewer osteotomies for lateral mandibular defects.
LD muscle use in scapular flaps significantly reduced complications like fistulas and nonunion (P=0.039).
Donor-site morbidity was lower in the scapula group (P=0.001).
No significant difference in QoL scores.
Complication | Scapula (n=58) | Fibula (n=62) | P |
Flap failure | 1 | 4 | 0.36 |
Soft tissue partial necrosis | 4 | 3 | 0.71 |
with exposed bone/plate | 4 | 0 | 0.05 |
Fistula | 6 | 4 | 0.51 |
Nonunion | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
ORN | 4 | 1 | 0.19 |
Donor site complication | 1 | 9 | 0.01 |
Medical/Respiratory complication | 6 | 1 | 0.04 |
Facial appearance (FACE-Q) | 68 +/- 23 | 60 +/- 21 | 0.767 |
Eating/Drinking (FACE-Q) | 54 +/- 22 | 60 +/- 20 | 0.113 |
Conclusion
Scapular flaps are effective alternatives to fibular flaps, with comparable function and superior donor-site morbidity. The chimeric nature allows for the easy addition of a muscle flap, which can help mitigate surgical complications
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths: Multicenter design, matched defect types, validated PROMs.
Limitations: Retrospective, shorter follow-up in scapula group.
Future Directions
Further prospective studies evaluating long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes are warranted.
Clinical Relevance
Scapular flaps are a viable primary option for selected mandibular and maxillary reconstructions.




Comments